News Technology and Asylum Procedures

Technology and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, new technologies are reviving these kinds of systems. By lie diagnosis tools examined at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technology is being found in asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into forced hindered techno-users: They are asked to adhere to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unpredictable tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs all their capacity to navigate these systems and to go after their right for proper protection.

It also demonstrates how these technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a flutter of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from accessing the programs of proper protection. It further argues that analyses of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of technologies, in which migrants happen to be turned into data-generating subjects whom are self-disciplined by their reliance on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double effect: while they assist to expedite the asylum procedure, they also make it difficult just for refugees to navigate these systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes these people vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.

Related Post